9/11 America’s Got Talent Results. Poor Format Yields Poor Results. An Incredible Finale Blown.

One of our readers pointed out something we did not get from the explanation of how they were doing the votes tonight on the ten finalists.  There were 20 total acts, and we thought and felt that a total vote competition was appropriate.  To not allow the acts from each night to compete against each other introduces a completely random selection into the mix.  An unfair flip of the coin, not chosen by the audience or the judges.

But our reader was right.  Five were selected from the first night and five from the second.  And the second night’s talent was vastly better, so it ruined a chance at a spectacular finale integrating mediocre talent from the first night.

There were two truly sad events on the show . Sharon voted for Daniel Jens to go into the top 10.  Sharon then followed up by not even remembering the name of Jonathan Burkin, referring to him as “Baton Boy”!!  This convinces us even more that the judges are useless and those that plan the show are pathetic.

Out of our top 4, 3 were selected.  But this was primarily because of the ill-conceived format not allowing the second night’s talent to compete with the first.  Jonathan Burkin was fantastic and better than anyone that performed the first night.  But he got eliminated because of the flip of a coin.

Sarah Lenore was fantastic.  She could compete on Idol.  Eli is better, but the selections from the first night that displaced Sarah were a joke.  Fat Lady (Emily) doesn’t hold a candle to Sarah.  Paul Salos?  Please.  Donald Braswell?  We are sleeping already.  Sarah blows them away, and we hope she shows up on Idol and makes fools out of the people that run this show.  The fact that Jessica Price is in the final 10 and Daniel Jens got within one vote of the top 10 while Sarah was sent packing demonstrates even more, this show is just way too random.

All three of our dark horses were picked.  Paul Salos, who we thought was better this week than last, but he wouldn’t have made it if he performed the second night.  Donald Braswell made it and that is sad as well.  He is a niche performer.  We would not pay to see him other than as part of a much broader show.   He is a snoozer, sorry to say.  And the child sympathy act got through.  Kaitlyn is super cute, but to even compare her to some of the talents eliminated in her favor is an insult to intelligence.

We were Wright on the Wright Kids.  And we thought the vote against Extreme Dance FX sad.

We agreed with Joseph Hall for the top 10 as well.

So where does that leave us?  We have three entries in the top ten that just plain to not belong there and do not have a prayer.  But at least they got rid of Jens.  Finally!!

The three mistakes:

1. Kaitlyn Maher – We said we would not be disappointed with Kaitlyn being in the top ten, but when we actually saw the talent discarded in her favor, we realized we were wrong.  She could not sustain an act in Vegas and the judges and audience know it.  This was all about child sympathy.
2. Paul Salos – Paul actually could carry a long act doing his show imitating Sinatra in Vegas, but no one would pay good money for it.  He could do an act in front of the slot machines, but talent-wise he doesn’t even qualify as a puppet for Terry Fator.  This was the elderly sympathy vote combined with random luck he got to go on the first night when the talent was weakest.
3. Queen Emily – The fat lady can sing.  She can’t win.  We wouldn’t pay to see her sing one song, let alone a show on Vegas.  She was a poor choice.

America didn’t really blow this.  America’s Got Talent is primarily to blame with this lame format and incredibly poor choices for each night, clearly placing the weaker talent on the first night.

In fact, though, this pointed out something random about the entire show.  The choice of talents for each week can result in incredibly unfair comparisons and eliminations.  We have a couple of suggestions.

1. Get rid of Jerry
2. Get rid of the judges
3. Have an overall elimination competition more like Idol that allows everyone to compete for America’s votes.

We think that the random choice of talent from night to night deprives America of the best competition.

We think Eli wins anyway barring elderly and child sympathy votes, but those have been particularly strong this year so you never know.  America is gullible when it comes to these acts and the show panders to them.

So let’s order the TOP 10 talents so far (bearing in mind this is before their final performances).

1. Eli Mattson
2. Nuttin But Stringz
3. Neil E. Boyd
4. The Wright Kids
5. Joseph Hall
6. Jessica Price
7. Paul Salos
8. Donald Braswell
9. Kaitlyn Maher
10. Queen Emily

However, we are a bit confused.  The judges often infer that the reason for choosing a talent to move on is whether they can “sustain” an act on Vegas that lasts over an hour.

But it seems like really, we are voting for talent, not Vegas.  Eli, for example, is hugely talented, but that doesn’t make him a long term Vegas act.  There just aren’t too many of those, and those that do Vegas regularly are older names like Frankie Vallie or Sinatra before he passed away.  Pearl Jam or Marc Cohn may show up on occasion, but they aren’t there every night.  It just doesn’t seem practical to consider a singer for such an act.

That said, that rules out Emily, Jessica, Donald and Neil, none of which are as talented as Eli and none of which, we feel would   And Kaitlyn is cute, but she could never sustain a Vegas Act long term.  She could be part of one, but not THE act.

Nuttin but Strings we think could, but would need a huge amount of choreography work and vastly more diversity than they currently have.  They are hugely talented and great to watch, but for over an hour every day on Vegas?

The Wright Kids could pull it off for a while.  But we think that America would tire of it quickly.  Again, they are more of a touring show than a fixture in Vegas.  We would like to see them at a local show perhaps, but we are not interested when in Vegas in paying to see them.

One thing there are a bunch of in Vegas in lasting acts are niche performers.  Female imitators, comedians, magicians, etc.  Paul Salos and Joseph Hall come to mind.  We don’t think people would pay to see Paul, but he could sustain a more minor act after the initial hooplah was over.  SImilarly, Joseph, with good choreography and some more practice could be a huge draw of young girls, at least for a while.  And Elvis impersonators are not uncommon at all in Vegas.

So now we have a conundrum.  Do we vote for the best talent or the act we think could survive in Vegas the longest?  If the former, the list above makes up our choices.  But if the latter, we would have to consider two of the less talented stars as the winner.    Is it “America’s Got Talent” or “Choose the Vegas Star”?

The polls below first appeared on this article and is still open for voting.

[poll id=”38″][poll id=”39″]

Related Posts with Thumbnails

4 thoughts on “9/11 America’s Got Talent Results. Poor Format Yields Poor Results. An Incredible Finale Blown.”

  1. Hi Kate.

    Don’t get us wrong, we like her, and if you read our prior article, we said we would not be disappointed if she were in the top 10. She just didn’t deserve to be.

    She is a cute little karaoke girl in our opinion. She has the timing right, and she could appear on television elsewhere and do a song or two and people would go “Awwwww, isn’t that cute?”

    But that is where it ends, and to compare her to the other talents is silly. Again, if they had a show specifically for child talent, we would love that and think Kaitlyn would do great.

    But to us, it is like bringing on a 5 year old break dancer to compete on “So You Think You Can Dance”. They may be cute, but the comparison of talent would be foolish.

    No four year old is as talented as the stars on this show. We are not disappointed she made it, but you yourself start talking about how “adorable” she is and you make our point even stronger.

  2. Re: Caitlin. While I agree that she probably can’t do a Vegas show, Child sympathy?? I don’t agree. I hardly think there would be many – if any – 4 yr olds in the world that can perform like she does. Personally, I think she is like a LeeAnn Rimes that will only keep getting better. And to say she is only being voted for because she is cute is not fair. The 9-yr old singer with autisim was adorable and had a great story but he couldn’t perform as well. I can’t wait to see Cailtyn become a star.

  3. i know this is your opinion, but how do you say one night that the Kaitlyn is worthy of 7/10 and is talented as well as cute and then tonight totally destroy her. I personally enjoy her but do not think she will win. Plus the Wright kids are just as much based on cuteness and child sympathy votes and you seem to have no problem with their advancement. Now i do agree that the way talent was divided was totally stupid but don’t just blame the show. They are responsible for the talent being unequal and seemingly giving everyone a sob story, but this is America voting. They were dumb enough to put Queen Emily in the top 4 and Daniel Jens in the top 6 ahead of both Extreme Dance FX, The James Gang, and the Cadance. America put Kaitlyn and Donald Braswell in the top 4 not the show. The good thing is that in the end, I don’t believe any of this will matter because Eli should and will win.

Leave a Reply