Jack Cafferty and CNN in Totally Chauvinist Male Political Attack On Sarah Palin

How pathetic can these liberal news outlets get? They print total diatribe with no backing or evidence of their claims, or use other liberal outlets as their evidence.

Worse, they make irrational claims against Sarah Palin as though they had anything to do with her personally or her ability to act as Vice President.  A DUI charge as a college student??  The charge was NOT against her mind you, but her husband.  OK, here is how their logic works.

20 years ago, Palin should have never gotten married being prescient enough to know her husband would have a DUI, and she would 20 years hence be nominated as a VP Candidate.  After all Billy Clinton didn’t inhale, right??!!  And he only accepted oral sex from Monica, so he couldn’t have gotten her pregnant.  And all he did was lie to the Justice Department, while he was the freakin’ President!!

Can these reporters on the Associated Press and CNN be any bigger imbeciles?  You would think Sarah had the DUI last week and was herself pregnant with her father’s child!

And a pregnant daughter is reason for such ridiculous statements.  Is Sarah a condom?  Should she have endorsed abortion for her daughter as the liberal CNN Democrats espouse.  We are sure they would love that decision.

One of CNN’s reporters, Jack Cafferty, makes this negative one-sided liberal useless tirade against Palin.  The twisted pig logic Cafferty uses by saying her husband was once the member of a group where “SOME MEMBERS” believe in secession from the union.   That is like saying you belong to a fishing club and some people in the group believe in abortion, so that makes Sarah Palin a supporter of abortion!  It is all twisted nonsense only a liberal idiot like Cafferty could construe.

Then Jack Cafferty claims to be a liberal while making rude comments about Palin’s pregnant daughter.  We believe Cafferty a chauvinist pig that does not believe in the rights of women to their bodies or to make their own decisions regarding conception.  In fact, we believe Cafferty and CNN believe Bristol should have called him personally for advice before she conceived!

As with most liberals, they are liberal only when it is convenient for them.  Roe vs. Wade only applies to liberal women, no other women have rights.  Find one women printing this bulls**t on CNN.  Give us one.  Just men judging women!! That was liberal of you CNN.  Maybe you should change from C-N-N to P-I-G?

Related Posts with Thumbnails

2 thoughts on “Jack Cafferty and CNN in Totally Chauvinist Male Political Attack On Sarah Palin”

  1. I hate all y’all, Libs and Neo Cons, life is all about money incase you didn’t know, BUT if you’re going to lie, then lie about something that can’t be corroborated. There is a video all over the web of the guy from the Alaskan Independence Party claiming that she became an R in an effort “to get along” but that she is “one of us!” BTW, I agree with them on some points, States’ Rights have definitely been tremendously eroded by them DC pukes starting as far back as 1812. Here’s their raison d’etre if ya will

    Platform and Goal
    of the
    Alaskan Independence Party

    We affirm that all political power is inherent in the people; that all government originates with the people, is founded on their will only, is instituted to protect the rights of the individual; that all persons have a natural right to life, liberty, the pursuit of happiness, and the enjoyment of the rewards of their own industry; that all persons are equal and entitled to equal protection under the law. We stand on a firm constitutional foundation.
    We pledge to exert our best efforts to accomplish the following:

    To effect full compliance with the constitutions of the United States of America and the State of Alaska.
    To support and defend States’ Rights, Individual Rights, Property Rights, and the Equal Footing Doctrine as guaranteed by the constitutions of the United States of America and the state of Alaska.
    To advocate the convening of a State Constitutional Convention at the constitutionally designated 10 year interval.
    To reinforce the unalienable rights endowed by our Creator to Alaska law, by eliminating the use of the word “privilege” in the Alaska statutes.
    To amend the Constitution of the State of Alaska so as to re-establish the rights of all Alaskan residents to entry upon all public lands within the state, and to acquire private property interest there in, under fair and reasonable conditions. Such property interest shall include surface and sub-surface patent.
    To foster a constitutional amendment abolishing and prohibiting all property taxes.
    To seek the complete repatriation of the public lands, held by the federal government, to the state and people of Alaska in conformance with Article 1, Section 8, Clause 17, of the federal constitution.
    To prohibit all bureaucratic regulations and judicial rulings purporting to have the effect of law, except that which shall be approved by the elected legislature.
    To preserve and protect the Alaska Permanent Fund, Permanent fund earnings, earnings reserve fund and individual Permanent Fund Dividends.
    To provide for the direct popular election of the attorney general, all judges, and magistrates.
    To provide for the development of unrestricted, statewide, surface transportation and utility corridors as needed by the public or any individual.
    To affirm and assert every possible right-of-way established under R.S. 2477 of July 26, 1866, before its repeal by the Federal Land Management Policy Act of October 21, 1976.
    To support the right of the individual to keep and bear arms.
    To support the complete abolition of the concept of sovereign or governmental immunity, so as to restore accountability for public servants.
    To support the rights of parents to privately or home school their children.
    To support the privatization of government services.
    To oppose the borrowing of money by government for any purposes other than for capital improvements.
    To strengthen the traditional family and support individual accountability without government interference or regulation.
    To support the right of jurors to judge the law as well as the facts, according to their conscience.
    To support “Jobs for Alaskans…First!”

  2. What hypocrisy!

    First of all, people like you wanted to crucify Obama for having acquaintance with William Ayers who’s anti-establishment activities occurred when Obama was 8 years old. You wanted to proclaim that Rev. Wright’s inflammatory words were in fact Obama’s. I guess that makes the Catholic religion a cult of homosexual child predators because of the widespread underground criminal behavior of more than a few Catholic priests. Both of these so-called affiliations are tenuous at best. But it is the choice of the flailing conservative movement to emphasize these relationships while maintaining a double standard when it comes to their new cheerleader, Sarah Palin.

    Using the strength-of-connection argument, you lose. It seems that in your blind inability to evaluate information independently, you suggest there is NO POSSIBLE CONNECTION between Todd Palin and the political ideology espoused by the Anti American Alaskan Independence Party of which he was a card carrying member. How can that be?

    Further, it is even more ludicrous to think it impossible for Sarah Palin to harbor the same ideology as her husband. She is married to him and allegedly has five children for him. It doesn’t seem so far-fetched unless one is unwilling to question the republican party. It will all come out soon and then everyone will see why the republicans are trying desperately to convince us of their “country first” credibility.

Leave a Reply