Richard E. Hug, a seasoned veteran Republican fundraiser, said “I’ve never seen this in all my years of raising money for political candidates, the first thing it suggests is foreign currency transactions, contributions from foreign donors, which is clearly illegal.”
Some appear to claim these disputed amounts were proceeds from Obama’s online store, but the campaign has never revealed the sources of proceeds from its online store, which was shut down after several news organizations revealed that Palestinians from the Gaza Strip and other foreigners had made large purchases there.
A good example of how suspect donors have made extremely unusual and suspect contributions is cited in this article.
Libyan leader Muammar Gadhafi, with proven terrorist ties, stated recently “There are elections in America now. Along came a black citizen of Kenyan African origins, a Muslim, who had studied in an Islamic school in Indonesia. His name is Obama.”
Muammar went on. “All the people in the Arab and Islamic world and in Africa applauded this man. They welcomed him and prayed for him and for his success, and they may have even been involved in legitimate contribution campaigns to enable him to win the American presidency.”
“We are hoping that this black man will take pride in his African and Islamic identity, and in his faith, and that he has rights in America, and that he will change America from evil to good, and that America will establish relations that will serve it well with other peoples, especially the Arabs”.
A Youtube video of Muammar, a known enemy of America and with known affiliations with terrorists is here, specifically referencing contributions made to Obama from the nations of terror.
A truly frightening quote from Muammar is “”The thing we fear most is that the black man suffers from an inferiority complex. This is dangerous. If our brother Obama feels that because he is black he doesn’t have the right to rule America, this would be a disaster, because such a feeling would make him act whiter than the white, and go to an extreme in his persecution and degradation of the blacks.”
Muammar is a terrorist. Let there be no mistake what he is speaking of here. He is speaking of a President of the US that acts in the interest of terrorists that attack and kill Americans. We digress a bit because we want to demonstrate the kind of supporters Obama has in the world. This article does an excellent job, and we cannot venture in this area without digressing too widely from our original premise.
We are concerned that Obama is concealing his sources of financial contributions for good reason, and that financial support from terrorist nations, terrorists and their supporters have been a major source of Obama’s funds. To what end? The destruction of Israel, a split Jerusalem, a recognition of Iran’s desire to wipe Israel off the map? Obama has stated openly he would proceed with negotiations with Iran without precondition.
Certainly, no US President could muster the strength to pass such radical ideas through Congress, but if it turns out, as it appears, that many of Obama’s supporters are terrorists and foreign nationals illegally contributing to his campaign that Obama does not wish to expose, it brings his ideology into focus because he has truly misled and misguided the American public, and it begins an alignment of our leadership with those that wish to see the United States and Israel destroyed or assimilated. In addition, his campaign has clearly broken the law, a critical law regarding the fairness of fund raising, bringing any election result favoring Obama into question.
Why doesn’t Obama want us to know? Because if America knew the above statistics across the board, they would have major second thoughts about Obama as a viable leader. If fully disclosed, we believe these donations would be tracked to sources of terror and that Obama’s policies once elected may be governed by these contributors.
Obama has made every effort to comfort American Jews and to state clearly his support of Israel. However, Obama has spoken of his support of Israel and that he favors a unified Jerusalem, but he has backed away from the latter. This MSNBC article clearly shows how Obama flip flopped on an undivided Jerusalem.
However, even if a review of the contributions made to Obama reveals that they are from sources that are not terrorists or nations supporting terrorists, his actions to conceal them makes him suspect. It is dishonest and, if, as it appears, many non-citizens have contributed to Obama’s campaign, it was clearly illegal. Obama can only distance himself so far from the fact that without the funds from the sources he has concealed, his race for the white house would not be nearly as successful as it has been.