Why The GOP Spent $150,000 for Palin’s Wardrobe

During the Presidential campaign, the Democrats found this tidbit of information regarding Palin.

We found it amusing because Obama took in well north of 600 million dollars in his campaign.  As a percentage of that amount, this was .02%.  Read that again.  .02%.

Most of the items the Democrats qualified as wardrobe were props for appearances in various parts of the country, worn for the appearance and returned or given to charities to help cancer, orphaned children, etc.  We would like to see Obama give back his 600 million to the poor, or John Edwards return his $1250 for his haircut to feed a starving child.

But the Democrats have made it a historic article, even though the election is completely over.

Let’s put this in perspective.  If Sarah had earned this much in a year, Obama would have given her a tax cut.

One liberal rag even published this article that poses a lie about Sarah that she wants to be the ambassador to Africa.  This after more lies about comments she made about Africa.  They then blocked all comments from readers.  The man that wrote the article isn’t worth the dirt on the bottom of Sarah’s borrowed shoes.

The same political rag published this nonsense about Africa. The writer looks like she is 12 and writes like it is her IQ.  Get something real to say guys.  There are important issues.  Lying about Sarah and imaginary people doesn’t help your cause.

Get over it dudes, we know you liberals love Sarah, but the election is over.

America Being Played For Fools By Terrorist Islam

Think honestly to yourself, no matter how liberal or radical you are, if, in 2001, someone told you after 9/11 our next President would have the middle name Hussein and the endorsement of terrorist organizations throughout the world, would you have believed it?

Some may say it is racist, but how can anyone deny it? Obama’s name has a similarity to Osama that is laughably close. To add the middle name Hussein has to be a joke on America. Coincidence like that does not occur. Of 350 million Americans, we are about to possibly elect Barrack Hussein Obama?

It cannot be coincidence. To realize he was raised a Muslim in Indonesia, all you have to do is make any attempt to research his past. For the man to claim he is a Christian is another farce. He has no church!

Obama has had associations with terrorists throughout his life. He claims he is a Christian, but abandoned his Church after his minister preached to “God Damn America”. In addition, the farcical church to which he belonged was not Christian as any sense of the word as Americans would understand it. A Christian church that did not believe in or preach Christian beliefs.

Obama wants to negotiate with Iran without precondition and abandon Iraq just like we did with Afghanistan years ago with disastrous results. Whose interests does this protect or assist? Iran would love the opportunity to walk into Iraq. The Iranian supported Shiites in Iraq would love to resume the genocide of their brethren hated by Iran.

And who endorses Obama? Most of his financial contributions are concealed and appear to be from international sources. Obama has refused to disclose them. And this video speaks of the types of supporters Obama has throughout the world

Obama has amassed a fortune in support from America’s enemies including over $33000 from two Palestinian brothers in a Hamas Refugee Camp. This is reported by Newsweek people, not some fly by night blog like HuffingtonPost.com.  And do you know who Huffington is owned by?  Oil barrons that made all their money off of oil!!  Surprised?

Obama and his money has even fooled American Jews, who apparently have been buffaloed into supporting him despite the fact he has spoken of a divided Jerusalem.

Bush has a very low satisfaction rating. A similar collapse in confidence occurred to Lyndon Johnson in the Vietnam war making him the last president to see such a complete loss of voter confidence. But to blame everything in the world on Bush and to feel that a Muslim associated with terrorists will solve all our problems if elected President is a sick joke on America pulled off beautifully with the money you have paid Arab nations for your fuel over the past several years.

As Obama allies with the Muslim nations that hold us hostage for our use of oil and that had much to do with driving us into this recession, Obama states how Exxon is at fault and McCain as well. This is to defer the actual responsibility from his brethren in OPEC that did everything they could to destroy our economy and drive oil prices higher. Think about what nation the 9/11 terrorists were from. It wasn’t Brazil folks. It was Saudi Arabia! Do you think they saw a huge benefit in the surge in the price of oil that resulted?

Expect Obama to ally with Iran and watch the assimilation of Iraq by the Shiites and Iran. Expect Obama to go into Afghanistan temporarily to justify his withdrawal from Iraq only to hand it back to the Taliban. Expect Obama to install the welfare state he preaches distributing the supposed wealth (operating capital) of small business to those that abuse the welfare system.

Just blame it all on Bush after Obama creates a Socialist state that supports Islam at the expense of a democratic America. To have elected a black man president is an honor. To elect one that is a Muslim with terrorist associations is an abomination.

Barack Obama: Elitism or the Condemnation of Intellect?

During this remarkable U.S. election season, talking points, laced with politically jargoned rhetoric have entered our ears and appeared before our eyes- thanks to the reporting of today’s numerous media sources and user blogs.

Anyone who has attempted to keep stride with the ever morphing events, within and between the presidential campaigns, has by now become acquainted with such keywords and phrases as, “earmarks,” “energy independence,” and “reform.” Additionally, another phrase has become a staple within mostly conservative circles and used as a rhetorical weapon against the opposition- “elitism.”

For the record, a rough definition of a person who embodies elitism is one who believes that he or she is of superior distinction and thus entitled to be treated and considered favorably.

Specifically, elitism is the word that has been pinned to the backside of Democratic Presidential Candidate Barack Obama. And that pesky little tail has been left to dangle in the minds of voters.

However, this election will not make the first time that many conservative politicians, and citizens alike, have labeled their more liberal counterparts as “elite.” Although ironically, it was Hillary Clinton who first pegged Barack Obama as “elite,” following a speech in San Francisco where he referred to people living in rural America as, “bitter, and clinging to guns and religion.”

The Full Quote:

“You go into some of these small towns in Pennsylvania, and like a lot of small towns in the midwest, the jobs have been gone now for 25 years and nothing’s replaced them. And they fell through the Clinton administration, and the Bush administration, and each successive administration has said that somehow these communities are going to regenerate, and they have not. So it’s not surprising then that they get bitter. They cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them, or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.” – Barack Obama – 4/6/08

It is obvious to understand why many Americans felt incensed by the above speech. On the surface, it appeared to be judgmental and divisive. However, is it possible that some Americans were upset by Obama’s remark because it hit too close to home?

Art Imitates Life – when in doubt, expound with a movie reference…

Entertainment notwithstanding, all we would need to do is watch the biographical movie, “Boys Don’t Cry,” to witness art imitating life. “Reel” life: where intolerant and disenfranchised communities, such as Richardson County, Nebraska, depicted in the movie, do exist. Of course, the movie in question is an extreme example, perhaps even a controversial one when used in this context, but still relevant.

Barack Obama has been called a rockstar, a snob, and most outrageously, “The Messiah.” Such accusations stem from Obama’s education, to his capacious and reflective oratory style, and popularity.

In May, John McCain urged Barack Obama to take a trip with him to Iraq. The objective would have been for McCain to prove to Obama that U.S. efforts have helped to stabilize Iraq. Obama declined the invitation, but in July, took a trip of his own to several countries in the Middle East, Including Iraq, and Europe.

Due to his popularity overseas, Barack Obama was notably depicted as the “biggest celebrity in the world,” by the McCain campaign. The message was relayed in an ad that aired after his trip to Europe, where he delivered a speech before a crowd of 200,000, in Berlin, Germany.

In August, while Barack Obama and family were on vacation in Hawaii, the RNC sent copies of what was called the “Barack Obama’s Hawaii Travel Guide,” to reporters. In the mock travel guide, a spotlight was focused on the Punahou School, the college preparatory institution that Obama attended in his youth. Conclusions were drawn, indicating that the RNC lampooned Obama’s education in its parody travel guide.

On a side note, Barack Obama attended the aforementioned college preparatory school from grade 5, until he graduated from high school. As a young adult, he attended Columbia and Harvard Law School, where he rose to be president of The Harvard Law Review.

Undoubtedly, the life of Barack Obama represents a classic case of the ever romanticized “American Dream,” no?

We should be comfortable asserting that most every American who was raised by responsible parents, regardless of class, was encouraged to study and do well in school. We should be willing to further assert that those same American children were also encouraged to attend college with goals of absorbing the relevant academia necessary for achieving their personal “American Dream.”

If we are honest with ourselves and subscribe to the above, we will fail to understand how conservatives, the RNC, some of our personal acquaintances, as well as our fellow late-night message board warriors have come to the conclusion that Barack Obama is indeed, an “elitist.”

Many Republicans and conservatives have reveled in the pick of Sarah Palin, Vice Presidential Candidate on the Republican ticket. Numerous reasons account for the support Palin has received from conservatives and the GOP. One reason Sarah Palin admirers give to explain their support for her is her “everyday people” appeal. These voters prefer the simple talk of Sarah Palin and John McCain to the poignant speech of Barack Obama- which is of course, their choice. However, much of the McCain/Palin supporters’ beliefs travel beyond the realm of preference- many of those supporters actually condemn the intellect of Barack Obama. This is evident with such statements as, “He (Obama) has so much to say but I just can’t be bothered to try to understand it.” Or, “He (Obama) can’t just say what he needs to without blathering about.” These are actual quotes from everyday people.

Since when has being a highly educated person become something to look down upon in America?

Is it because some of us feel inferior when faced with the apparent intellect of others?

How could this attitude affect how our children view education?

Curiously, a contour of conservative values is self-reliant independence, yet many conservatives demonize education- the fundamental vessel for success in America. How sad and unfortunate it is that so many would rather elevate their egos with the illusion of “relating” to their “neighborly-like” presidential pick, instead of embracing a fine product of education- Barack Obama.

Should Republicans and conservatives support Barack Obama for president? No. They should also cease insulting their own personal intellect and patriotism by condemning a genuine manifestation of the “American Dream,” which is Barack Obama.

Obama, “Say It To My Face”. If You Do, You are Covered Under Obama’s Plan

By S Daniel Miller, Guest Writer

Obama attacked John McCain in a recent TV interview, saying “Say It To My Face”. What is amusing about Obama’s response is that it is, in and of itself, an attack. Obama has been running a negative attack on McCain from day one. For him to criticize the McCain camp for any negative comment is laughable.

Obama has attacked every facet of the current administration and made every attempt to link McCain and the Bush Administration, no matter how different those policies are and no matter how different they are from the past. Obama started this dirty campaign during the primaries, and now he whines and cries wolf when McCain strikes back.

One of Obama’s best quotes ever.

“I am surprised that, you know, we’ve been seeing some pretty over-the-top attacks coming out of the McCain campaign over the last several days, that he wasn’t willing to say it to my face. But I guess we’ve got one last debate. So presumably, if he ends up feeling that he needs to, he will raise it during the debate.”

Maybe McCain should, but then again why give Obama any chance to defend his radical positions. Should we give his nonsensical attacks equal time to the real issues. The Republicans should take a new tack. The Obama campaign is brilliant at promising America nirvana by spending money they do not have.  With the economy getting flushed down the toilet, neither man has the ability to deliver on any of the promises, so McCain may as well follow Obama’s lying lead and promise planetariums in every house, free real estate for every citizen, new appliances for every home owner.

As an example of the foolishness of the Democratic camp, one should consider heavily the promise of the Obama Health Plan. It is insane. He promises to cover pre-existing conditions, for anyone. In Massachusetts, they instituted the exact same plan last year. IDENTICAL. And after JUST ONE YEAR, premiums on most plans are up 40% in the state as healthy people are forced to pay for the sick. It is just another TAX people!! Welfare for the ill. They are just finding another way to tax you without your knowledge!!

In Massachusetts, and nationally, if Obama gets his way, your best bet is to just pay the tax penalties; they are vastly cheaper than the exorbitant price of insurance that has now exploded to about $20000 to $24000 a year for a decent plan. Then, just pay the doctor out of pocket. It is way cheaper for a person of normal health. And then, if you get sick, sign up!! You can be on the plan by the 1st of the ensuing month. GREAT PLAN!!

Massachusetts is obtuse in pursuing this kind of plan, and Obama is using it as a model. The result will be everyone will be forced to pay ridiculous medical premiums to support people that jump on the train just as they get seriously ill.

I am pregnant, honey, sign up for insurance.

I was just diagnosed with cancer, sign up for insurance.

I just had blood in my stool, sign up for insurance.

Our tax dollars at work.  Democrats need more of them.  Lots more.

ABC’s Charlie Gibson/Barack Obama Interview 10-8-08

Integrity Watch: Hey McCain…. Say it to His Face

Tuesday, October 7, 2008, Barack Obama carried himself with fluid ease and grace during the second and most recent presidential debate. He seemed to wear a steady, almost amused expression throughout the evening. Could it have been because he was calmly laying in wait of McCain to mention his association with William Ayers?

Obama seemed to grow more amused still, as the debate drew closer to the end. Was it because he realized that McCain would likely sidestep the issue altogether, which in turn could create quite the advantageous situation for Obama?

Such an advantageous moment arose when Barack Obama was interviewed by ABC’s Charlie Gibson, Wednesday night. Due to the recent effort of the McCain campaign to convince voters that Barack Obama is the wrong type of American, thus cannot to be trusted, Gibson questioned Obama as to whether he was surprised that John McCain failed to mention Obama’s relationship with William Ayers during the last debate. Obama replied with this:

“Well, I am surprised that, you know, we’ve been seeing some pretty over-the-top attacks coming out of the McCain campaign over the last several days that he wasn’t willing to say it to my face.”

What a beautiful and brilliant move on Obama’s part.

In this play, Obama issues a clear challenge to McCain. He’s basically sayin’ *(wink)* to him, “Put up, or shut up.” Obama’s statement, no doubt, implies that he is willing to address the issue. It places McCain in a very precarious position, for certain. Ick!

I mean…really? What in creation is a maverick to do?

Let us assume that John McCain does not want to incorporate the subject of William Ayers into the next debate. What will he do, or not do, in the meantime?

Will McCain and Palin, in respect of campaigning, stop the terrorist association speech, and officially reprimand the vile rhetoric ascending from the crowds?

If the Straight Talk Express mutes its mention of Obama’s association with William Ayers over the next week leading to the debate, the GOP base might view McCain as folding under Obama’s challenge- “…he wasn’t willing to say it to my face.”

How does a bona fide alpha maverick justify backing down?

Not to mention that McCain suddenly opting out of the hate would present a clear admittance of guilt and evidence of wrongdoing in the minds of undecided voters. Tisk.

On the other hand, if McCain and Palin continue to incite lunacy along the campaign trail, and McCain again fails to mention Ayers during the final debate, it could serve to solidify the belief that John McCain and integrity, (are more than likely), not mutually exclusive. John McCain has accused Barack Obama of nothing short of travesty in the company of his followers, yet he cannot bring himself to take up the matter with the man, himself.

Of course, finally, if McCain decides to answer Obama’s challenge by introducing the William Ayers association into next week’s debate, voters may possibly see it as a desperate and misplaced move. After all, as Obama remarked to Gibson about McCain, “…he wasn’t willing to say it to my face.”

Really, Obama looks like Joe Pesci (Casino) right now…”Listen to me Anthony. I got your head in a ******* vise.”

Well, figuratively speaking, that is.

ObamaGate: Obama Associated With Organization Subpoenaed for Voter Registration Impropriety

On October 4, we reported on the association between Obama and William Ayers. We were not the first, and referenced articles from such publications as the Wall Street Journal. In fact, Hillary Clinton had brought up the issue as problematic during the Democratic Primary.

At the time, we dismissed the relationship as little more than an indication that Obama was more radical than he presents himself.

If you read this article, it will give you a better understanding of who Ayers is and how Obama interacted with him.

Their relationship in an organization named the Chicago Annenberg Challenge (CAC) has strong implications regarding Obama’s ideology. CAC was formed for a good purpose. It was supposed to distribute monies from the Annenberg Foundation for funding educational programs. Instead, the board, including Obama and Ayers, funneled monies to radical organizations. In order to get access to funds, schools had to associate themselves with the radical organizations and align with their causes. Students and programs based on scholarship merit were summarily rejected. The results of a study demonstrated that, despite all the money spent (tens of millions of dollars), the program was completely ineffective from an education standpoint.

It was not, however, ineffective at supporting the radical organizations to which it funneled its funds. One of the organizations was the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN).

ACORN has turned out to be more of a radical organization than we originally thought. Apparently, offices of ACORN have been raided by authorities for attempting to manipulate voter registration. ACORN members were attempting to influence Democratic voters to register more than once. Some apparently had registered as many as 72 times. The US slogan is “One Person, One Vote”. Apparently ACORN’s slogan is One Democrat, As Many Votes as We Can Get.

According to the New York Post, ACORN, whose political wing has endorsed Barack Obama, relentlessly pursued Democratic voters to register multiple times. Subpoenas have been ordered in an investigation run by election officials.

The New York Post Article states when speaking of several voters that were subpoenaed, Christopher Barkley, Lateala Goins and Freddie Johnson:

Barkley is one of at least three people who have been subpoenaed by the Cuyahoga County Board of Elections as part of a wider inquiry into possible voter fraud by ACORN. The group seeks to register low-income voters, who skew overwhelmingly Democratic.

“You can tell them you’re registered as many times as you want – they do not care,” said Lateala Goins, 21, who was subpoenaed.

“They will follow you to the buses, they will follow you home, it does not matter,” she told The Post.

She added that she never put down an address on any of the registration forms, just her name.

A third subpoenaed voter, Freddie Johnson, 19, filled out registration cards 72 times over 18 months, officials said.

“It feeds the public perception that there could be [fraud], and that makes the pillars fall down,” said local Board of Elections President Jeff Hastings.

According to this CBS Market Watch article:

“Thousands of allegedly fake voter registrations by a nationwide organization are being investigated. At least nine states are reviewing voter paperwork, and Allegheny County police are looking into similar accusations.”

Apparently, according to this article, the initial probes were launched in Cleveland against ACORN in August.

Obama and Ayers, during their time at CAC, filtered millions to ACORN. This impropriety is accentuated by the fact that ACORN publicly endorsed Obama for President and was specifically targeting Democratic voters in their attempt to fraudulently garner more Democratic votes in key states.

At this time, there is no direct association between these criminal activities and Obama himself, but it does bring prior voter tallies in some states into question. We consider this a critical issue in the ongoing saga of Obama, Ayers, CAC and ACORN, and we will do our best to keep you abreast of anything we find.

In Retrospect, Palin Is NO NIMBY. Heroic Speech Questions Obama’s Double Speak

In her September 3rd speech accepting her selection as the Vice Presidential candidate for the Republican Party, Palin astutely stated, “U.S. reliance on imported oil poses a national security risk, and energy policy should include everything from expanding domestic drilling to finding alternative fuels”. 

The Democrats appear to think we should continue to import our resources while we take decades to bring on alternative fuels, but with the NIMBY attitude of the US, that isn’t going to happen any time soon. We need to break the ecology extremists that would save a chicken at the expense of a human life. These liberals would see our economy crushed before they would stop sending huge amounts of American currency to the home of the terrorists that executed the 9/11 terrorist attacks.

Palin went on, “”We need American energy resources, brought to you by American ingenuity, and produced by American workers.”

Palin showed that she has more savvy and is more cognizant of America’s situation than the Democrats which are still planning on addressing our national deficit by blocking energy advances in America and continuing to import foreign oil at huge expense.

We are NIMBY’s. It has to stop. It has to stop now. the Democrats support NIMBYism and are desperate to continue to add to our national deficit and to discourage the tapping of US resources and inherent creation of US jobs.

These policies, combined with a set of programs that would cost nearly the national deficit with no logical explanation of how to pay for them, has driven us away from Obama.

Obama has a chance to sway the moderates like us to his side, but it isn’t lying in his commercials. He has to answer several questions.

1. How do we reduce our dependency on foreign oil ASAP? We have a hint. It isn’t ethanol.

2. How do we pay for 400 billion dollars worth of Democratic programs with only what Obama states is a small tax increase on those making over $250,000?

3. How do you roll back Bush Tax Cuts without raising taxes? Aren’t raising taxes and rolling back tax cuts the exact same thing?

4. How can you say you will solve Social Security Problems by taxing people a decade from now, when you know you can’t possibly even be in office by then? Wouldn’t that just be deferring responsibility to your successor?

Those would be our questions to Obama in the debates, and we are not CBS, a pandering network in Obama’s pocket.

If you, our readers, can provide the answers to any of these questions above, we welcome your input, because we sure can’t.

McCain Versus Obama, The 2008 Presidential Election Debates, The Hard Questions Demand Answers

Have a question for the two candidates? Publish it here by leaving a comment!

The Hard Questions For McCain

  1. Do you feel that Senator Palin is Ready to assume leadership in the Whitehouse as well as Joe Biden?
  2. How can you institute a tax credit on Health Care without just allowing the insurers to raise prices and consume that tax credit instead of the people that are purchasing the health care?
  3. Isn’t taxing health care over a certain dollar amount discriminatory against those that live in areas with a higher cost of living?
  4. How long will we be in Iraq in your eyes?
  5. You speak of a tax cut, but what form will it take and how will it help America?
  6. What is your primary focus on immigration?
  7. Could you explain your privatization plan on Social Security?
  8. If you are elected President, do you plan to reinstate the draft, and if so, under what circumstances?

The Hard Questions For Obama

  1. How do we reduce our dependency on foreign oil ASAP?
  2. How do you roll back Bush Tax Cuts without raising taxes?  Aren’t raising taxes and rolling back tax cuts the exact same thing?
  3. How can you say you will solve Social Security Problems by taxing people a decade from now, when you know you won’t even be in office by then?  Wouldn’t that just be deferring responsibility to your successor?
  4. How do we bail on Iraq without a clear plan.  Isn’t blaming it on the Iraqis who are getting killed, bombed and intimidated by terrorist factions unfair?
  5. What is your primary focus on immigration?
  6. Your program costs equal the entire national deficit.  How will that be paid for?  If you say it is closing loopholes, what loopholes?  If it is taxing people earning over 250,000 a year, can you show us the math on that?
  7. What is your viewpoint on repealing legislation that directly impacts civil liberties, such as the Patriot Act?

To add your questions, leave comments below, and we will incorporate them into the article!! Contribute and speak your mind!