Back in July, the Huffington Post devoted its home page to a photo of Donald Trump and the headline, “You’re Fired! From Our Political Reporting.” What followed was “An Important Note On Our Coverage Of Donald Trump’s ‘Campaign.’”
In short, the editorial board of the Huffington Post declared Trump a “sideshow” and announced that any future coverage of Trump would be found under HuffPo’s entertainment section. HuffPo’s adherence to its own rule was spotty at best, but tonight, the Huffington Post has another important announcement:
HuffPo, smelling blood in the water as Trump announced a “total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States,” just couldn’t hold out any longer. Arianna Huffington herself declaredin a lengthy essay that, from now on,the Huffington Post will“not only be covering the ways Trump’s campaign is unique in recent American politics, but also the disastrous impact it continues to have on his fellow candidates and the national conversation.” Or it could just cover the news as news. Or not bother at all.
Something tells us the whole “covering Trump under our entertainment section” smackdown didn’t sting quite like it was meant to.
Read more: http://twitchy.com/2015/12/07/huffington-post-moves-donald-trump-coverage-back-to-news-section-readers-unmoved/
Celebrities are experts at Making the World a Better Place.Which is lucky for us, because we’d never know how intolerant we are if not for stuff like this:
For real, though:Judging by the reaction on Twitter, it seems like the effort didn’t really producethe desired effect.
Read more: http://twitchy.com/2016/01/25/expecting-an-oscar-straight-celebs-pose-as-gay-to-teach-a-lesson-or-something/
We have watched the web become a slingshot for the liberal press to fling articles at us bashing the Republicans and anything non-liberal. Honestly, we expect the web, with outlets like the HuffingtonPuffingtonPost to be completely biased against McCain and anything non-liberal, but CNN has gone overboard with their liberal tactics. They have totally reversed the facts in this article…
If McCain or his camp stood up and said these same things after being bashed repeatedly by the Obama camp and the liberal press, CNN would have used a title like, “McCain Can’t Take It”, or “Palin’s Crying Smears Her Lipstick”. The writers at CNN act like a bunch of children.
They are using a quote from an Obama advisor to state that McCain is dirty in his attacks on Obama? Fact is,from what we are reading, it is just the opposite. Throughout our newspapers and all over the web all we see are attacks on McCain and Palin. We haven’t even decided on who to vote for for president yet, but when we post any article on our website that favors McCain in any way over Obama, even if Obama’s position is a joke, we receive a string of hate mail and insults. When we criticize McCain, we hear nothing at all. They (the McCain camp), apparently, can take the criticism and move on while the liberals are apparently a slew of cry babies.
From what we can gather, the liberals believe a criticism of Obama is an attack, but a criticism of McCain is informational. The comments in the CNN article are bitter and childish and they aren’t being made by McCain or his camp! They are quotes from Obama and his. In fact, we can’t find one quote in the article that is a specific McCain attack against Obama, but we see quote after quote of insulting attacks from Obama.
Obama needs to be less of a cry baby and more of a man if he wants to get elected President. CNN and the other liberal outlets should try it. A bit of non-biased writing might help their image.
Let us know if McCain calls Obama on being a Muslim and we will believe Obama is more than a cry baby campaigner. In the meantime, Obama said he was a Muslim all by his lonesome. He didn’t need McCain’s help.